Natural Health

Back Door Attack on Homeopathy: Speak Out Now, Or Lose Your Freedom (3)

May 19, 2012 by admin in Politics with 17 Comments

Page 3: Civil rights can be lost in sudden coups or they can be lost drop by drop, through incursions into our lives that may seem intended for our benefit or seem to affect someone else, not you. In our great land, we’re losing our rights through the dripping method.

Barbed Wire, Threatening Sky

Continued from Page 2
by Heidi Stevenson

Click here to take action!

Overall Effect

Full implementation of the Medicines Act 1968 with its revisions will result in a dramatic loss of access to a health treatment modality that many people find effective and convenient. The obvious result will be the loss of a healing modality that as many as 6,000,000 people rely on and have a right to utilize, plus the loss of many small businesses, further devastating our nation’s fiscal health and eroding our town centers.

Most significant, though, is the chilling effect on people’s right to manage their health as they see fit.

Whether you approve of homeopathy or not, there is no legitimate argument that a governmental agency should regulate homeopathy medicines in the same manner as pharmaceutical drugs—in particular when the costs are borne by individuals, not the state-provided system.

Civil rights can be lost in sudden coups or they can be lost drop by drop, through incursions into our lives that may seem intended for our benefit or seem to affect someone else, not you. In our great land, we’re losing our rights through the dripping method.

If you believe that homeopathy doesn’t work, then this probably won’t matter to you. However, what happens when something you do like is attacked? If this attempt to destroy homeopathy takes effect, then a precedent will be set. Rights will continue to drip away. At some point, an issue you care about will be lost.

Wouldn’t it be ironic to realize that your willingness to force your views on others leads to the loss of your own cause?

How to Fix the Problem

Fortunately, the fix is very simple. Section 10 of the Medicines Act 1968 should be amended with a simple statement that is equivalent to one that’s in another pending act, the Medicines Act 2012. Section 195(1)(2)(a) effectively exempts most homeopathic preparations:

195. —(1) Regulations 173 and 174 do not apply to the sale or supply, or offer for sale or supply by a person (“P”) of a medicinal product if—

(2) This paragraph applies to a medicinal product that consists solely of one or more unit preparations of—

(a) any substance where the unit preparation has been diluted to at least one part in a million (6x);

Simply adding wording equivalent to this in Section 10(4)(a) would resolve the problem. That’s what we need to ask for. 

In plain English, all you need to do is state that medicines diluted to at least one part in a million, homeopathy’s 6X potency, should be excluded from Section 10 of the Medicines Act 1968.

Take Action!

It’s late in the game. This law will probably take effect sometime towards the end of May or during June. If you truly value your freedom, then you need to take definitive action now! The best thing you can do is go to your Member of Parliament’s office and state your concerns. When someone goes to the trouble of assuring that a face can be put to this issue, it stands a good chance of being remembered and taken seriously.

Barring that, then the action that can have a serious effect is to write a message and mail it or send it by e-mail to your Member of Parliament. We need numbers. There are millions of people who take advantage of homeopathy and swear that it’s benefited them. Some believe it’s saved their lives.

Here are keys to writing your message:

  • You may feel insecure about writing. The quality of writing doesn’t matter. What does matter is that you make the effort and ask for the right thing.
  • Your message need not be long.
  • If possible, you should include at least one point that supports your reason for asking that Section 10 of the Medicines Act 1968 be amended. It can be a personal reason or a technical one.
  • Be specific about what we need. State that Section 10 of the Medicines Act 1968 should be modified to include a statement like Section 195(1)(2)(a)—or more simply that you believe homeopathic medicines should not be included in Section 10 of the Medicines Act 1968.

That’s all!

How to Contact Your MP

It’s not difficult. Even if you don’t know who your MP is, here’s all the information you need to produce a message and send it to the right place:

  • To send an e-mail, go to the Write to Them website (http://www.writetothem.com/). Just follow the instructions. It will help even if you don’t know your post code!
  • To send a letter, mail it to:(Your MP’s Name)
    The House of Commons
    Westminster
    London SW1A 0AA
  • You can obtain your MP’s name and direct contact details by dialing the House of Commons Information Office at 020 7219 4272 or go to the website Find Your MP (http://findyourmp.parliament.uk/).
Thank You!

  <<<  1  2  3  

Photo by Dan of FreeDigitalPhotos.net.

Sources:

Addendum:

If you’re curious about which five pharmacies form the backbone of homeopathic prescribing in the UK, they are:

  • Helios
  • Ainsworth’s
  • Nelson’s
  • Freeman’s
  • Weleda

 

Related Posts

  • Pingback: Back Door Attack on Homeopathy: Speak Out Now, Or Lose Your Freedom | Gaia Health

  • Pingback: Back Door Attack on Homeopathy: Speak Out Now, Or Lose Your Freedom (2) | Gaia Health

  • clens

    Not really surprising I guess with privatisation of health coming in.  I read something saying that all over 50s should take statins.  This is obvioulsy a money spinner for Big Pharma isnt it. Tories complain Labour was nanny state, but Tories are the  deceivers, privatisers and bullies.  

  • Peter Thingy

    The regulation of homeopathic medicines in the UK is something that 

    • HeidiStevenson

      There is truth in what you say. However, it assumes a concept that is offensive in the extreme. The fact is that homeopathic medicines have not been regulated because there was – and still is – no need to regulate them. Under British law, anything that wasn’t specifically made illegal was legal. Simple as that. Now, though, under EU directives, the opposite is true. Thus, British Common Law is no longer the law of the land. And the people of Britain never had the right to vote on it.

      To suggest that a right must be specifically granted before it can exist is offensive in the extreme. It is, of course, an EU concept – but it is not in the interests of civil rights.  

      To suggest that there’s a “duty” to prevent unregistered homeopathic medicines from coming on the market is a legal construct of the EU. It is NOT based on any moral or ethical concept. If duty is merely a construct of what is and is not legal, then duty has no meaning other than to be in lockstep with jackbooted thugs.

      • Peter Thingy

        The various EU directives were the result of heavy lobbying by homeopathic industry and interest groups in Europe. They are the result of treating homeopathic remedies as “medicine” and in many EU countries homeopathy being the preserve of the medical profession.

        UK Common Law does allow for the existence of lay homeopathy. This is not the case in other countries.

      • Me

        Heidi

        Very interesting. However, there is, of course, no such thing as ‘British Law’ or ‘British Common Law’.

  • Doglady

    Heidi – I consider myself an intelligent person, and I support the homeopathic modality.  I am opposed to the government’s desires to ‘wash it away’ so to speak.
    But, I must say, I find your article hard to understand.  I get the general idea, but if I’m to share this with people who may not spend as much time as I do reading about the government’s infringements on homeopathic medicine, this article is only going to confuse them.  WHY do we NOT want it treated like medicine?!!!!  I like your point, I just don’t think the article does justice to what you’re trying to get across – and it’s such an important point!!!!

    • HeidiStevenson

      To treat homeopathic medicines in the same manner as pharmaceuticals is absurd. 

      Turn the question around and explain why they should be treated in the same manner.  To begin with, if there’s going to be regulation over something, then there should be a need for it – but no one has demonstrated such a need. Therefore, there’s no reason to treat them the same way.

      I’m sorry you find the articles difficult to understand. The fact is that what’s happening is not simple. The purpose was not to justify homeopathy, but to point out that the right to it is being stolen. It’s an issue of civil rights. 

      What’s being done by the government is complex. Sorry you found it tough going.

      • Jo

        I may be mis-remembering, but weren’t the European directives a direct result of lobbying by homeopaths many years ago?

        • HeidiStevenson

          Some probably did, and if so, they were naive. They never imagined that the remedies they use, which are acknowledged to be harmless and always claimed by homeopathists to work under different principles than pharmaceuticals, would then be treated in the same manner as pharmaceuticals.

          Even if some homepaths did, it’s not a justification for applying the same rules to homeopathic medicines as are applied to pharmaceuticals. They are two different things. 

          To treat them in the same manner would be equivalent to treating alcohol and water in the same way because they’re both defined as liquids. It’s obviously ludicrous.

          • Jo

            To treat them in the same manner would be equivalent to treating alcohol and water in the same way because they’re both defined as liquids. It’s obviously ludicrous.
            LOL! That made me laugh!

          • HeidiStevenson

            Glad you liked it!  It just came out the tip of my fingers – going to have to use that again.

          • Jo

            I might just steal it! :-)

  • Kate Stockford NZ

    This is crazy!! The Queen uses Homeopathy for God’s sake!! When she travels she takes 60 remedies as part of her must have first aid kit no matter where she goes! Is she ever sick? Rarely.

  • DebbyBruck

    Heidi, it appears only UK citizens may contribute their thoughts on this matter. Am I incorrect? Can others have a say?

    • / Heidi Stevenson

      This was a UK issue. It’s too late to contribute your thoughts now. The 2012 medicines act has been passed. While it’s happening slowly, changes are starting to occur. The first targets have been homeopathic pharmacies. Their kits, such as for birthing, are being banned. Helios has been fighting it, but …

      Homeopathic practitioners who aren’t government authorized – which means not medical doctors or a small group of others, such as nurses, with such licenses – are illegal, though there has been no move against them so far.

      As with the destruction of access to herbs, the process is slow. However, the process against herbs started over a year ago and we can see the effects. Many herbal products are quietly disappearing off shelves across the nation.

Search Gaia Health
newsletter software