Featured

Why Trans Fat Is So Bad – and What Is It, Anyway?

November 10, 2012 by admin in Food/Nutrition with 9 Comments

Trans fat isn’t crooked—and that’s the problem. Though it’s chemically identical to natural fats, it doesn’t bend. Here’s a clear and simple explanation of why, what it means, and why trans fats are so dangerous.

Woman with Out of Order Sign on Headby Heidi Stevenson

We have been indoctrinated about fats for decades. Starting in the 1950′s, we were inundated with ads about how bad saturated fat is. We were, and still are, advised by our doctors to avoid butter and use margarine, or better yet, avoid fats altogether. Fairly recently, conflicting information has been coming out. Polyunsaturated fat is good…no, it’s bad. Monounsaturated fat is good. Fat that’s solid at room temperature is bad. No, coconut oil is good…and so forth.

So, what’s the truth? Fat is good for you!

At least 25% of your calorie intake should be comprised of it. As you know, veggies are good for you, and if fresh, their oils are healthy, too. With that undeniable fact, it’s been an easy sell to convince people and their doctors that we should avoid saturated fats and eat veggie oils—with “in moderation” tagged on to pay lip service to the (misbegotten) idea that we should keep fat out of our diets. The catch is that little word, fresh. It’s virtually impossible to get fresh vegetable oil to the supermarket shelf. It goes rancid in no time at all. Therefore, it’s processed by hydrogenation.

This technique keeps the vegetable oil from rapidly going rancid, making it profitable to store and sell. There is, of course, a price paid for this agribusiness profit—your health.

Isn’t it interesting that, just as the medical system started telling us that we need to avoid saturated fats and use vegetable fats is when heart disease started to skyrocket? To fatten agribusiness pockets, we were told to avoid the fats that are good for us, and eat processed junk fat.

The Differences in Unsaturated, Saturated, and Trans Fats

Saturated Fat MoleculeTo understand this better, let’s first take a look at what saturated fat is. As shown in the image to the right, the term describes fat molecules in which all possible hydrogen bonds have been made. That means that every carbon atom in the molecule is paired with one or more hydrogen atoms, so it’s loaded to capacity—saturated—with hydrogen. (The full picture is complicated by whether the carbon has double or single bonds, but it’s not necessary to get into that detail to describe the distinctions that we’re concerned with here.)

Cis Fat MoleculeUnsaturated fat molecules have a characteristic, called cis. (Image to the left.) The term cis means that atoms are located on the same side of a molecule. Trans means that identical atoms are located on opposite sides of a molecule.

Because the hydrogen atoms of naturally unsaturated fats can be on the same side, they tend to repel each other. This results in a bend in the molecule, making the molecule more available for bonding with others.

Trans Fat MoleculeTrans fats are formed by forcing hydrogen through fat at high heats. (They are not formed by cooking alone.) This results in hydrogen being bonded on opposite sides of the molecule, as shown in the image to the left. Because they’re not adjacent to each other, the hydrogen atoms do not repel each other, so the molecule does not bend. The molecule is, therefore, more stable, not as readily able as cis fat molecules to bind with the atoms of other molecules.

What difference does a bend make?

It would seem that a little bend wouldn’t matter, since the saturated fat molecules and trans fat molecules are chemically identical. The first thing to understand is that cell walls consist of about 50% saturated fat. When we eat trans fats, they can replace the saturated fats in cell walls.

Cell walls can, and must, be permeable—but only to the right degree. Nutrients pass through the cell wall into the cell, while wastes and toxins pass through them in the opposite direction to be removed from the body.

Because trans fats are more stable chemically—the direct result of the hydrogen atoms being on opposite sides of the molecule—they do not interact properly with other molecules. The cell wall itself is not as tightly bound as it should be, making it weak and more permeable than normal. Thus, molecules of toxins that would have been too large to enter a cell may now be able to squeeze through the cell wall and wreak havoc inside.

Many substances move in and out of cells via messages exchanged through the cell wall. They function by chemical signals or exchanges, or by shape. Trans fats are less chemically active, so the proper signal exchanges cannot be made and normal cell communication cannot occur. Trans fats are also shaped differently, so molecules can be stuck either inside or outside the cells. When trans fats replace saturated ones, critical nutrients may not be able to enter cells and toxins may not be able to exit.

The result is a deranged metabolism, which affects every aspect of health.

Aside from composing half of cell walls, saturated fats play many other important roles in the body. They’re needed for energy, hormones, and signalling, such as communication to allow or refuse entry to a cell.

Hormonal signals, such as adrenalin in the fight-or-flight response, may not be properly received and acted upon. In a real emergency, one’s reflexes and ability to run can be jeopardised. In the modern world’s typical high-stress environment, the body’s inability to respond to adrenalin may result in the adrenal glands pushing even harder to produce more and more adrenalin. A common problem today is adrenal fatigue, which can lead to thyroid malfunction. It’s certainly not surprising that women are experiencing an epidemic of thyroid burnout.

Prevalence of Trans Fats

When you see the term trans fat, you should immediately think of hydrogenated fat. When you see the term hydrogenated in any context, you should think trans fat. The bottom line is that they all refer to the same process of hydrogenation, which not only destroys the quality of food, it makes it dangerous.

Partial hydrogenation is done to increase shelf life of oil. Vegetable oils are quite healthy when they’re fresh. That is, though, the rub. They go rancid quite rapidly, making it virtually impossible to get them to supermarket shelves and store them long enough for sale. Therefore, you must assume that they have been partially hydrogenated. They have gone through the same process, but not as extensively. As a result, the oil is stable, so it takes a very long time to become obviously rancid, but it’s now a poison.

Trans fats, whether fully or partially hydrogenated, are not simply foods from which nutrition has been leached. They’re poison. To suggest that partially hydrogenated oils are okay is like suggesting that it’s better to take one poison because it’s less poisonous than another. Both are poisons. When you consider how heavily vegetable oils have been pushed—virtually defined as the key to good health—it isn’t difficult to see why cancer, heart disease, and many other chronic diseases have become so common.

Sources:

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

  • Pingback: That 'Organic' Peanut Butter Might Be Doing Irreparable Harm | Gaia HealthGaia Health

  • andre

    Hi, Heidi. In the text describing the second image (cis fats) you write “naturally unsaturated”. I think you meant to write “naturally SATURATED” because you are describing the difference between the cis and trans saturated fats? Or did I miss something? Best Regards, Andrej

    • / Heidi Stevenson

      Thank you, Andrej! I’ve corrected it. It’s quite frustrating, but you just can’t see your own work immediately after producing it, so even the most careful self-editing misses a lot. What’s even worse is that, in this case, I’d originally written it correctly – but miscorrected it on editing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/alex.sakers Alex P. Sakers

    Hello,

    I appreciate that you wrote this article to warn about the dangers of trans fats but there are a number of inaccuracies especially regarding the biochemistry behind trans fats. I would be happy to work with you to try to correct these.

    1) Andre – you were incorrect – the cis fats are naturally unsaturated; they are not saturated fats.

    2) “Because the hydrogen atoms of naturally saturated fats can be on the same side, they tend to repel each other. This results in a bend in the molecule,

    – Repulsion has nothing to do with the bend in the molecule; it is the shape of the bond that produces the bend. If repulsion DID have anything to do with the shape of the molecule it would tend to make the molecule straighter.

    3) making the molecule more available for bonding with others”

    -A cis fatty acid actually bonds less tightly with other fatty acids than a trans fatty acid or an unsaturated fatty acid. Think about this anaology. Imagine trying to pack 100 pencils into a tin can. If you do this all of the pencils will be lined up and paralell to each other. Now imagine that half of your pencils have a bend halfway down their shafts. They won’t pack as tightly will they. It is exactly the same for fats.

    4) “Because they’re not adjacent to each other, the hydrogen atoms do not repel each other, so the molecule does not bend. The molecule is, therefore, more stable, not as readily able as cis fat molecules to bind with the atoms of other molecules.”

    -As we have seen above trans fats are actually interact more strongly with unsaturated fatty acids than cis fats.

    5)”Because trans fats are more stable chemically—the direct result of the hydrogen atoms being on opposite sides of the molecule—they do not interact properly with other molecules. The cell wall itself is not as tightly bound as it should be, making it weak and more permeable than normal.”

    Trans fats would not produce this effect. If a trans fat replaces a cis fat – it would tend to DECREASE the fluidity of the cellular membrane not increase it. (Think of the pencil analogy above). If a trans fat replaced a saturated fat it would not have a market increase on membrane fluidity. There is some evidence that membrane fluidity correlates with membrane permeability but it is not a simple relationship – “http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494139″.

    • / Heidi Stevenson

      My head is spinning! You’re right about the CIS fats being unsaturated.

      The information I’ve read tends to offer the opposite conclusions about how CIS and trans fats behave chemically. I’m not trying to suggest that you’re wrong, but that I do require more information to support it. In any case, the point that there’s a difference in chemical behavior between CIS and trans fats is unchanged.

      Can you write to me at [email protected], please?

    • andre

      Actually, I did not claim that they were. I simply asked Heidi if she meant to write that because the text seemed to be analysing the difference between naturally saturated and artificially saturated (hydrogenated) fats, and seemed to imply that trans fats are a type of saturated fats. So it was only logical to me that the other type it was being compared to (cis) would also be saturated. I am not an expert, so I was not offering my advice, I was asking for clarification (perhaps I could’ve asked more directly, instead of offering suggestions). That is why I wrote the line: “Or did I miss something?”. Anyway, thanks for the information. It is very useful.

  • Pingback: Even Some ‘Organic’ Peanut Butter Could Do Major Damage | TheSleuthJournal

  • EducatedPerson

    Hmmm, I’ve never seen a molecule where there is a bend in the middle of a single bonds. Molecules like that which don’t exist are scary!

  • Pingback: Food Irradiation Supports Agribusiness, Not Health – Gaia HealthGaia Health

Search Gaia Health
newsletter software