Featured

No Value in Any Influenza Vaccine: Cochrane Collaboration Study

October 5, 2012 by admin in Vaccines with 152 Comments

This study is damning of the entire pharmaceutical industry and its minions, the drug testing industry and the medical system that relies on and promotes them. Influenza vaccines produce no benefit and cause serious harm. (Updated article.)Cochrane Logo Over Syringe

by Heidi Stevenson

A remarkable study published in the Cochrane Library found no evidence of benefit for influenza vaccinations. It’s also damns the quality of flu vaccine studies by saying that the vast majority of trials were inadequate. The authors stated that the only ones showing benefit were industry-funded. They also pointed out that the industry-funded studies were more likely to be published in the most prestigious journals … and one more thing: They found cases of severe harm caused by the vaccines, in spite of inadequate reporting of adverse effects.

The study, Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults, is damning of the entire pharmaceutical industry and its minions: the drug testing industry and the medical system that both relies on and promotes them.

In the usual scientific journal style of understatement, the authors concluded:

The results of this review seem to discourage the utilisation of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure. As healthy adults have a low risk of complications due to respiratory disease, the use of the vaccine may be only advised as an individual protection measure against symptoms in specific cases.

The Study

The authors attempted to find and investigate every study that has evaluated the effects of flu vaccines in healthy adults aged 18-65. To this end, they “searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2010, issue 2), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2010) and EMBASE (1990 to June 2010).” They included 50 reports. Forty of them were clinical trials adding up to over 70,000 people. Two reported only on harmful effects and were not included in this study.  Studies of all types of influenza vaccines were included: live, attenuated, and killed—or fractions of killed—vaccines.

The primary outcomes they looked for were numbers and seriousness of influenza and influenza-like illnesses. They also looked at the number and seriousness of harms from the vaccines. The authors attempted to collect missing data by writing to the individual studies’ authors. They describe the response as “disappointing”. In the end, they included 50 studies and refused to use 92, mostly because of highly significant flaws, such as using inappropriate controls, not being randomly controlled trials, inconsistencies in data presented, lack of study design, unclear definitions, poor reporting, lack of crude data, and lack of placebo.

The authors found:

  • Vaccines administered parenterally, that is, outside the digestive tract—which generally means by injection—reduced influenza-like symptoms by only 12%.*
  • They found no evidence that vaccination prevents viral transmission in healthy adults! (There goes the whole herd immunity argument!) This is particularly significant because, as they noted, inactivated vaccines are known to perform best in healthy adults.
  • They also found no evidence that flu vaccines prevent complications, either. They attempted to ascertain the degree of complications, and though they did report on some, most of the studies simply did not address the issue or did so inadequately.

*Please note that the article originally read, “reduced influenza-like symptoms by only 4%”, which was incorrect. The figure has been changed to 12% to accurately reflect the study’s report.

Conclusions

The Cochrane study found very little evidence to support even a small improvement in time off work. Even that finding needs to be put into the context of industry influence. The authors wrote:

This review includes 15 out of 36 trials funded by industry (four had no funding declaration). An earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies. The content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding.

“…industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies…”

“…reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin…”

“…there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions…”

Most assuredly, the “content and conclusions of this review should be interpreted in light of this finding”!

Even without taking into account the shoddiness of the studies in general, the authors were still hard put to find any benefit of any sort for influenza vaccinations in healthy people. At best, they found a small decrease in number of days off work. They did not find that the vaccinations had any benefit whatsoever in complications or mortality.

In spite of the limited reporting on adverse effects, the authors did find some, including 1.6 Guillain-Barré cases per million.

The question that must be asked is: How can influenza vaccinations be justified when there is virtually no benefit—not even the oft-cited dubious herd-immunity—and cases of severe harm are documented, in spite of disgustingly limited reporting of adverse effects?

It is long past time to end the travesty of jabbing adults and children without a shred of evidence showing benefit in spite of trying to find it, and with evidence of crippling harm, in spite of trying to mask it.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

  • http://www.facebook.com/lmarkssmith Lisa Marks Smith

    I almost died from a flu shot in Oct 2005. Vaccine Court conceded my case and settled with me. I bet you never saw that on the news. Even though I contacted all media outlets I could find.

    • Jennifer Zampino

      Hi Lisa, I’m very familiar with you’re case as I am reading Vaccine Epidemic at the moment. Thank you for you’re valuable contribution to this important book. I try to warn family and friends about this dangerous unnecessary shot. At my baby’s last 9-month well visit I politely declined the flu shot which they offered!

    • Dulcimist

      Please tell us more. What happened? What were your symptoms, etc….I only had one flu shot in my life and i thought I was going to die….I have never been so sick in all my life!

      • http://www.facebook.com/lmarkssmith Lisa Marks Smith

        within 2 weeks I was paralyzed, I was told to get my affairs in order. As the paralysis spread I was told I would die when it hit my lungs or heart. I spent 24 days in the hospital, had to learn to walk again, and did not feel my legs for the next 4 years.

    • Dulcimist

      Did you ever see the YouTube about the nurse who was a nursing instructor at the time she had a flu shot and now is incapacited from the shot???? She said that she used to administer flu shots to others and now that she had a severe reaction and is bed ridden, she wants others to know what can happen.

  • Erin Douglas

    The only time in my life I have ever had the flu was shortly after the only time I have ever received the flu vaccine.

    • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

      Absolutely. And the only time I’ve ever had a car accident was the day after the only time I’d watched a total lunar eclipse. OBVIOUSLY the lunar eclipse must have caused my car accident… So people, whatever you do, DON’T WATCH LUNAR ECLIPSES…. they’re dangerous!!

      • http://www.facebook.com/jody.nickerson.96 Jody Nickerson

        do they put Thimerosal in Eclipses?

        • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

          So you’re suggesting that thimerosal causes influenza symptoms now? I thought it only caused autism?

          • William Andrew Channell

            Burn! I guess Jody has no good answer for that one!

  • Pingback: No Value in Influenza Vaccine: Cochrane Collaboration Study | Similima

  • jarofstars

    Hallelujah, this report made it out somehow….maybe the idea of forced vaccinatio/vaccinations at all will begin to crumble.

    • Sandy

      I wish. Work for a company that requires it. But, I go to a homeopath. Not covered by insurance but ask me if I care. In case you were wondering — Nope, not one bit!

      • Dulcimist

        You should be able to get an exemption from the vaccination…have you ever checked into it???

    • http://www.facebook.com/tony.rao.92 Tony Rao

      We wish. What will happen as more and more people start waking up to the lie is, vaccine producing companies and their ex-CEOs, ex-lobbyists, and ex-lawyers, employed at top posts in government will try to force vaccinations on the citizenry, through regulations and hearsay, in an effort to keep the dollars flowing.

      Look at what Governors in TX, CA and elsewhere have done with the Guardasil cocktail. They successfully vaccinated thousands of children under the age of 18 WITHOUT PARENTAL PERMISSION. Only after there was a huge public outcry did it stop. Media is in collusion, government is in collusion. Some know it is illegal and do it anyway, others are simply uneducated about the matter and continue to stick people.

      • jarofstars

        Hey don’t pop my bubble! lol. You are probably right, but as more people become educated; I feel somewhat more hopeful.

  • Pingback: The Robert Scott Bell Show a THE VACCINE EMPIRE COLLAPSED by Jon Rappoport

  • Pingback: The Robert Scott Bell Show a Flunk the Flu Shot, Dr. Rashid Buttar Advanced Medicine, Whoopin Cough Vaccine Failure, Cancer Increase Relations, Steroid Injection Meningitis Outbreak, Chemtrails Detox, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Homeopathic Drainage, A

  • Pingback: The Robert Scott Bell Show a Flunk the Flu Shot, Dr. Rashid Buttar Advanced Medicine, Whooping Cough Vaccine Failure, Cancer Increase Relations, Steroid Injection Meningitis Outbreak, Chemtrails Detox, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Homeopathic Drainage,

  • Pingback: The Robert Scott Bell Show a Flunk the Flu Shot, Dr. Rashid Buttar Advanced Medicine, Whooping Cough Vaccine Failure, Cancer Increase Relations, Steroid Injection Meningitis Outbreak, Chemtrails Detox, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Homeopathic Drainage,

  • Pingback: The Robert Scott Bell Show a Flunk the Flu Shot, Dr. Rashid Buttar Advanced Medicine, Whooping Cough Vaccine Failure, Cancer Increase Relations, Steroid Injection Meningitis Outbreak, Chemtrails Detox, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Homeopathic Drainage,

  • Sandy

    What makes me really sick is the vaccination of babies now. It was bad enough to pump this stuff into our elderly and most vulnerable adult population. Now we get to study the long-term effects because people are being told GOOD parents vaccinate their children. If I knew then what I know now, I don’t think my child would have received vaccinations. However, now he’s in the military and has probably been injected w/ everything from moon rock dust to swamp water.

    • http://www.facebook.com/tony.rao.92 Tony Rao

      Very very true. Unfortunately, government uses the military as guinea pigs for vaccines, DU, and all sorts of other things.

    • http://www.facebook.com/globalwarrior Diane Lorna Drayton Buckland

      It is shocking, these potent neurotoxic chemical cocktails almost killed my only child 24 years ago and his life was ruined.

      • http://www.facebook.com/theresa.e.lewis Theresa Elain Lewis

        this happened to my girlfriends child she was fine till the vaccine and then she was a vegetable till she died at 13…

    • Dulcimist

      The sad thing is that they even vaccinate pregnant women….purposely to vaccinate the baby while still in the womb…..

      • http://www.facebook.com/hblexrude Heather Blexrude

        St. Agnes Hosptial/Agnesian Healthcare in Wisconsin forced their pregnant employees and employees in general to receive this vaccine or they were fired. Some even had religious exemptions submitted that they denied saying they weren’t sincere.

        • http://www.facebook.com/hblexrude Heather Blexrude

          OH and one of the employees got that Guillain-Barre Syndrome as well!

    • whiteoleander

      This is only talking about the flu shot. Every other vaccine should be given to children. Including polio, MMR, pertussis. Those vaccines have been proven effective at almost wiping out diseases that used to kill and/or paralyze and/or seriously harm children and adults. Don’t take this study to mean every vaccine. Clearly, that is NOT what it states.

      • http://twitter.com/doctorsensation tonibark

        sorry to burst your bubble, but the other vaccines have not been proven to do anything of the sort. You need to look at the data and not repeat “truisms” disease rates from all infectious and scurvy were dropping drastically over the early 20th century due to improvement in water, sewage and nutrition (hence falling scurvy rates) the deat rates for all the vaccinable diseases were where they are now prior to introduction of large scale vaccination. In fact, death from HZ is up due to the chicken pox vaccine shifting the m and m to shingles.

        • whiteoleander

          First of all, scurvy has nothing at all to do with vaccines. Secondly, you need to look at the data and how there were massive polio epidemics all over world prior to the 1950s that were maiming hundreds of thousands of people a year, which led to the race to find a vaccine, which caused the direct decrease of polio to less than a thousand cases a year. The rest of your post is beyond laughable. The virus that causes chicken pox (which is a new vaccine) is always in you after you’ve had chicken pox and when you’re immune system is compromised, like when you’re old (and those people got chicken pox the old fashioned way, not through a vaccine), it travels back up your nerve ganglia and you get the shingles. So, no, also not vaccine related at all. Why you would even mention scurvy in a post about vaccines is beyond me.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            If you look at the stats on polio, you’ll find the same sort of curve trajectory as any other infectious disease. It had largely disappeared with the advent of good water, food, and sewage.

            The fact is that a damaged immune system is what results in shingles. And that’s what you get with all these vaccinations.

            And perhaps referring to scurvy wasn’t the best choice – but what about scarlet fever? It has the same kind of curve – to near disappearance – with improvements in water, sewage, and food.

            Plot infectious disease deaths in the US during the 20th century and then pinpoint the dates of vaccine introduction for each one. You will be hard pressed to find a blip in the graphs. That is proof that vaccines have not provided the health benefits claimed.

          • whiteoleander

            When you are old, your immune system fails, because you are OLD not because of vaccines that you may have gotten. Your whole body fails because you are OLD and then you die. Shingles has nothing to do with vaccines. And now I’m trying to figure out why you’re talking about scarlet fever, which also has nothing to do with vaccines. Furthermore, scarlet fever is BACTERIAL whereas vaccines are for VIRAL infections. For bacterial infections, we have antibiotics, for viral infections we have vaccines. And no, there is no “curve” of diseases being on the out before vaccines were invented. Some things improved with the advent of indoor plumbing, but it was related to the vaccines, not the plumbing. You are very confused.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            Precisely! Yes, people die when they’re old. No one is suggesting that it’s a result of vaccines. The fact is that the flu vaccine does nothing to help the elderly.

            As to scarlet fever, that should be obvious. Why would scarlet fever nearly disappear along the same trajectory as those infectious diseases with associated vaccines? It’s because there is little connection between the disappearance of any of these diseases and vaccinations.

            No, it’s not true that vaccinations are only for viral diseases. Tetanus, for example, is a bacterium.

            Yes, there is such a curve: Proof that Childhood Vaccines Are a Hoax. The graphs used come directly from JAMA.

            Be careful of what you accuse others: Clearly, the one who’s confused is you!

          • whiteoleander

            You are the one who suggested that people get shingles because of vaccines, not me. Scarlet fever has not disappeared, it is treated now with antibiotics. Another wonderful invention of modern science and medicine.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            I never made that claim. You have reached the point of absolute absurdity. You haven’t made your points, and when it’s demonstrated that you haven’t, you change the topic. I don’t have the time to deal with you any longer.

          • whiteoleander

            You never made that claim? “The fact is that a damaged immune system is what results in shingles. And that’s what you get with all these vaccinations.” Your words, not mine.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            That was a different thread, not this one and is therefore not legitimate to this debate. My apologies on that point. I had thought you were referring back to your initial foolish comment in response to someone else. (However, in all fairness, your comments have been all over the board, not sticking to the topic. It’s a tad difficult to keep up with each detail.)

            But do a little digging, and you’ll find that it’s true. It isn’t until the immune system is weakened that shingles bites.

          • http://www.facebook.com/sgoodson Sunnie Goodson

            @ whiteoleander: this isn’t a peer-reviewed article, and there are ads all over it (again diminishing its worthiness). Hopefully people realize what they are reading before they commit the information to fact. If I used this article in a paper, it would get chewed up and spit on by any professor. Point is, we should not just believe everything we read on the internet because someone put up some fancy graphs and bogus data. Anyone can go out and make an argument for whatever fear-instilling claim they wish to make. And for that, none of us should take each other’s word on it. I’ve already done my homework. And I feel confident in the advice I heed to my patients.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            What do you think pays for those journals? They are loaded with extremely highly-paid ads from Big Pharma. And you consider them reliable? Have you paid no attention to the scam about how unreliable most of these studies are?

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            (Referring back to whiteoleander’s comment that begins “I’m not the one trying to change the subject. You stated that disease was wiped out by better sewage treatment and nutrition. I pointed out that in 3rd world countries, vaccines work regardless of their poor nutrition and sanitation. “)

            Don’t be ridiculous. You made the claims & I countered them. That isn’t bringing a new topic into it.

            You have just gone on a rant that demonstrates precisely nothing, and is all over the place with things that are totally irrelevant. Thank you for demonstrating how illegitimate your comments are. And that is now the end of it.

          • whiteoleander

            Furthermore, your own article above states that “The authors attempted to find and investigate every study that has evaluated the effects of flu vaccines in healthy adults aged 18-65.” The vaccine is actually beneficial for the elderly. That is from YOUR own article. It may not be beneficial for the young and healthy, but it certainly is for the elderly or anyone else that is immune-compromised.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            You don’t know that to be true. The study – which I’ve read and obviously you have not, though you’re the one making the accusation of not reading scientific matter – refers to ages 18-65. It says nothing about other ages. Your claim that the vaccine helps the elderly is based on nothing but your desire that it be true.

          • whiteoleander

            And where does your claim come from about the flu vaccine not helping the elderly or those that are not young and healthy?

          • whiteoleander

            And I love how the link you posted says “There are several others, of course, but they are either too recent to take into account or not truly associated with childhood illnesses, such as smallpox and polio, which are more appropriately considered epidemic diseases.” Oh sure, let’s just forget about polio and smallpox since they were conveniently wiped out by vaccines. Let’s just leave those two big boys out since we can’t include those as proof that vaccines work. Smallpox was so deadly before vaccines were invented that it could almost wipe out the world if ever made a resurgence without a vaccine handy. How convenient to leave those out.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            No, they weren’t. Smallpox didn’t start to disappear until the advent of good food, water, and sewage. And the same has also been documented in this discussion regarding polio. Your reverting to that claim is absurd.

          • http://www.facebook.com/sgoodson Sunnie Goodson

            Actually tetanus, is a toxin, produced by a bacterium. As well is typhoid. The vaccine is not against a bacterium.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            The antigen used in tetanus vaccines is the toxin, but the disease name refers to the tetanus bacterium, Clostridium tetani. And the fact still remains that vaccines are NOT only about viral infections. You are attempting to change the subject.

          • whiteoleander

            “If you look at the stats on polio, you’ll find the same sort of curve trajectory as any other infectious disease. It had largely disappeared with the advent of good water, food, and sewage.” This is a lie. There were HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of cases a year, all over the world, before the polio vaccine was invented. After this, in the 50s, the number of cases per year dropped to UNDER A THOUSAND. That is such a huge drop, and way way way after indoor plumbing and proper food handling was invented. And in countries where they have no plumbing and still don’t, 3rd world countries where they don’t have a pot to pee in and still poop in holes in the ground, or their own drinking water supply. Even in those countries, polio was almost eradicated. And even to this day, in places where children are being crippled by polio, the medical team goes there and begins mass polio immunizations, and they stop the disease in its tracks without ever changing anything about their food, sewage, lifestyle, etc. These are very poor, 3rd world countries, not some posh house with indoor plumbing and fresh fruit and veggies in the fridge. Clearly, your thinking is very faulty.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            You should be careful before accusing people of lying. You’re simply wrong here. Polio’s trajectory during the 20th century clearly follows the same trajectory of other infectious diseases, as documented here:
            Proof that Childhood Vaccinations Are a Hoax

            What seems like a huge drop to you is, relative to what went before, a drop in the bucket. Your thinking is based on faulty assumptions.

            If you believe that polio has disappeared, then you have no idea of how the stats are manipulated. I’m not going to argue that particular point here. This has gone on long enough and your points have not been correct to this time, and there’s no point in your continued claims after your initial ones are demonstrated to be entirely false. It should be fairly obvious now that you do not have the facts on your side. You have only the claims of modern medicine’s disciples.

          • whiteoleander

            The point is that you do not have any science on your side at all. None of the minions who believe that vaccines are bad have science or modern medicine on their side. And yet, you all line up for your antibiotics when you’re sick, or your child is injured, or your parents need medication to keep them alive, or your sister needs cancer treatment, or your cousin needs insulin. You don’t scoff at modern medicine then, even though it all comes from the same big pharma. Please read Dr. Offit’s “Deadly Choices”, and then get back to me. Your are seriously misguided by the anti-vaccine propaganda. At least if there are more people like you, Darwin’s theory will take over and weed you out.

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            You are clearly wrong, as I’ve documented. So now you go off on a tangent, trying to change the subject. That is not a legitimate method of debate.

            Insulin is not the topic here. Cancer treatment is not the topic. Dr. Offit is called Dr. Profitt for good reason: He’s wealthy as a direct result of a vaccine patent. Worse, his claim that 10,000 vaccines could be given to a child without harm is absurd on the surface. Why would I read a book by him?

            Yes, I have seen children and adults deformed by polio. That’s got nothing to do with whether the vaccine wiped out the disease.

            Regarding being willing to read medical documents: Any perusal of this site will demonstrate the falsity of that absurd statement. You have no idea what you’re talking about and you are unable to back up your claims. Now you have descended into completely illegitimate modes of debate, which is not allowed here.

          • whiteoleander

            I’m not the one trying to change the subject. You stated that disease was wiped out by better sewage treatment and nutrition. I pointed out that in 3rd world countries, vaccines work regardless of their poor nutrition and sanitation. No reply from you on that. You stated that the flu vaccine has no benefit to the elderly. Well, your own article states that is untrue. No response from you. You stated that shingles are caused by being vaccinated. Well, you did try to back track on that one. You conveniently left out polio and smallpox on that link. No reply about that one either? You brought up scurvy and scarlet fever? You stated “If you look at the stats on polio, you’ll find the same sort of curve trajectory as any other infectious disease. It had largely disappeared with the advent of good water, food, and sewage.”, and yet you cannot seem to include smallpox in there or explain why the polio vaccine works in 3rd world conditions where it is dirty? You’re saying that if everyone washed their hands and ate their fruit and used indoor plumbing that smallpox would have gone away without vaccines? Well, we shouldn’t worry at all then that the armies all over the world would love to get their hands on the stuff to use it as biological warfare, since we will all be fine as long we eat healthy and use the toilet. What a relief that they can just throw out the smallpox vaccine. Would you go into a village, or take your children, where polio has not been conquered and is running rampant without having been vaccinated against it?

          • http://www.facebook.com/sgoodson Sunnie Goodson

            I’d like to see how fast all the “non-believers” would all run out to get the small pox vaccine if there were ever a shred of evidence that it was back in circulation. Test your immune systems on that one…. Better yet, test your baby’s non-existent immune system on that one.

          • http://www.facebook.com/sgoodson Sunnie Goodson

            ^^ Thank you Jonas Salk. For those that doubt the polio epidemic and the effects a vaccine had watch “A Paralyzing Fear: The Story of Polio in America”, for those of you that do not have a molecular biology and physiology education. The chicken pox disease causes shingles, as they are the same virus. It is a herpes virus, and we should all know by now that those are incurable and are living within our nervous system for LIFE. Get cold soars? You’ll get them forever when your system is weakened. Had chicken pox? You may very well get shingles later in life. Hence the “break out” on our posterior surface, where the virus lives in the nerve ganglions.

          • http://www.facebook.com/sgoodson Sunnie Goodson

            Thank you ^^, you took the words out of my mouth.

  • Pingback: THE VACCINE EMPIRE COLLAPSED « Jon Rappoport's Blog

  • Pingback: No Value in Any Influenza Vaccine « Talesfromthelou's Blog

  • Pingback: The Robert Scott Bell Show a Omega 3 Fats for Troops, Coast Guard Corey Thrives, John Dennis Liberty Candidate Takes on NDAA’s Nancy Pelosi, Withdrawal of Consent, Komen Cure Outrageous Pre-emptive War on Mammaries, Jon Rappoport Dismantles Flu Shot

  • Pingback: The Robert Scott Bell Show a Omega 3 Fats for Troops, Coast Guard Corey Thrives, John Dennis Liberty Candidate Takes on NDAA’s Nancy Pelosi, Withdrawal of Consent, Komen Cure Outrageous Pre-emptive War on Mammaries, Jon Rappoport Dismantles Flu Shot

  • Pingback: Jon Rappoport – The Vaccine Empire Collapsed – 9 October 2012 | Lucas 2012 Infos

  • Pingback: Cochrane Collaboration: La vacuna contra la influenza es inefectiva. « Disiciencia

  • Pingback: Koniec mitu,i powodów do paniki.Nauka jeszcze istnieje.!!!The vaccine empire has collapsed « Zenobiusz's Blog

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Pingback: No Value in Any Influenza Vaccine: Cochrane Collaboration Study « The Invisible Opportunity: Hidden Truths Revealed

  • James

    I would live to be able to repost this and support it but there are no citations. I have no idea who you are and anyone I shared this with would believe I’m a fanatic that believes everything on the Internet is true.

  • Emma

    Why don’t you say who conducted this study?

    • GaiaHealth

      Read the study if you want to know. It’s linked (but you already know that).

  • Emma

    From your link to the study (in the Abstract):

    Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms
    and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect
    complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.

    Doesn’t that directly contradict what you’re saying in your article title?

    • Dulcimist

      I know of a large extended family that all got the influenza vaccine, except one, and she said that the family members that were vaccinated had symptoms much worse than hers…….

    • GaiaHealth

      You are picking at a nit. The fact is that the study also states quite clearly that there is precious little benefit – and that little bit was found from industry-financed studies.

      • crystalblueeyes

        I think your a nit. Or maybe a cockroach.

  • Emma

    I’m shocked that the critical comments are being deleted immediately….

    • GaiaHealth

      And you get that idea from where? Did you reach inside your empty head to find that idea knocking around?

      However, you won’t be making any more comments here, as you have used up a lot of space to say nothing of value.

      • crystalblueeyes

        What an ignorant bunch running this slanted, pathetic blog or whatever garbage you purport this to be. What an ignorant cunt you are.

  • Emma

    Hmm…any comment that points out the complete contradiction between what the study says and what you are saying it says is deleted right away.

    Who’s afraid of the truth now?

  • Emmie

    Hmm…any comment that points out the complete contradiction between
    what the study says and what you are saying it says is deleted right
    away. So…who’s afraid of the truth now?

  • Kelly

    From the study:

    “Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms
    and working days lost. There is no evidence that they affect
    complications, such as pneumonia, or transmission.”

    I think your headline is wrong and sensationalist. You have purposely misconstrued quotes to suit your agenda.

    • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

      As answered elsewhere:

      You are picking at a nit. The fact is that the study also states quite clearly that there is precious little benefit – and that little bit was found from industry-financed studies.

      You pick at nits to suit your agenda.

      • crystalblueeyes

        And your a snot faced knowitall.

  • Amelia

    I’m really surprised you would come to this conclusion since the conclusion of the study itself is in direct opposition to what you’re “reporting.”

  • Amelia

    Wow. I’ll say it again, since my first attempt was deleted. You’re conclusion is in direct opposition to what the study itself concludes. I’ve read your article and the study and I think you’re grasping at straws with this one. I’m sorry.

    • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

      Nothing you’ve written has been deleted.

    • crystalblueeyes

      They delete what they disagree with.

  • Pingback: No Value in Any Influenza Vaccine: Cochrane Collaboration Study |

  • Kathleen Tammaro

    I get 75 health points at work if I get a free flu vaccine! Not if you paid me.

  • Pingback: Flu vaccine - Foods Matter Research, News and Comment

  • Pingback: The Truth About Flu Shots | Paranormal Utopia

  • Pingback: THE VACCINE EMPIRE COLLAPSED | Center for Advanced Medicine & Clinical Research

  • Allyson

    can you post the link to the actual study? :)

  • ellen

    Please sign this petition !

    A UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE TO MANDATORY VACCINATIONSWe the undersigned, as Freemen &
    Freewomen, do not recognize the authority of The World Health
    Organization (WHO) to mandate general forced vaccinations. Our bodies
    are sovereign territory and subject to our exclusive self-determination.
    Any attempted violation of this trust must be construed as a breach of
    said basic right. We are thus holding our elected Governments
    accountable in this defense with an issuance of notice: a preemptive
    Class Action Lawsuit to be served in the event our inalienable rights to
    choose are forsaken.

    Zie verder : http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/a-universal-declaration-of-resistance-to-mandatory-vaccinations/?cid=FB_TAF_CIT

  • Melmalign

    It seems to me the people who are quick to argue this point are the ones who lack the understanding of literary terms, thus making them incapable of understanding what they read and less likely to step out of the herd of “sheeple” to do a little research for themselves. Keep up with the good work Gaia!

    • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

      And those who are quickest to jump on the conspiracy / anti-vaccination bandwagon tend to be those with poor scientific literacy and a strong tendency for confirmation bias.

      Better education is the answer.

      “Science” is not the collection of technologic end products we know and use every day. Science is the method we use to work out what is true about the universe, and what is unsupported wishful thinking.

      Understanding the methods of science and, by extension, the ability to correctly analyse and interpret data reported by others, is critical to forming accurate and correct conclusions.

      • Miodrag Milić

        “Science is the method we use to work out what is true about the universe, and what is unsupported wishful thinking.”

        Science can not tell you what is true since its not Mathematics (where you can prove things). All you can say that science collect evidences in favor of something. As such, you can never be certain what is true (because evidence can be faked, corrupted, misleading…), and you need to choose your side.

        Vaccines as technology probably have merit, although I don’t believe they are developed in such manner yet. We are not yet understanding even remotely close the effects of interference with microcosms (as shown more and more about antibiotics recently).

        The other thing is that forcing vaccines prevents us (because of limited resources) to find the more effective therapy (if it exists, and I know it does because __in my case__ vitamin C megadose prevented influenza almost completely)

        • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

          Nitpicking, my friend. My use of the word “true” was meant in the sense of the truthfulness of every day facts (e.g. my computer is resting on my desk, the Earth travels in an elliptical orbit around the sun, etc.)

          And yes, science is the method by which we collect and evaluate evidence which either supports or helps us reject a given hypothesis. We cannot prove hypotheses or models in the mathematical sense, but there comes a point when a very high probability is close enough to certainty for non-philosophical purposes.

          There’s still a possibility that the sun is actually some dude in a fiery chariot riding around the world… however, the preponderance of very good quality evidence suggests that it is a very large ball of very hot gases around 150 million km away, powered by nuclear fusion in its core. In your philosophical sense, i cannot be “certain” that the latter is the case, but which possibility do you think most likely represents reality?

          • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

            “And yes, science is the method by which we collect and evaluate evidence which either supports or helps us reject a given hypothesis.” That’s an absolutist statement, a denial that there is any other way of knowing. And that, “my friend” is a statement of religious fervor, not one of science.

            You make wonderful-sounding generalized statements, but they have nothing to do with this issue.

          • http://twitter.com/doctorsensation tonibark

            Chris, you should read actual studies not funded by the industry and look at the real AR and RR’s. you will find industry funded adverse events studies can’t even give you actual AR or RR because there are not real control groups. the controls are receiving placebos such as adjuvants, other vaccines (in order to induce fever0 or in the case of the rotateq, and undisclosed placebo. a study like that would

          • http://twitter.com/doctorsensation tonibark

            fail any methodology class

  • Miswest Mom

    After reading the study to which the article refers, I can’t find where it says that the vaccine only reduced influenze symptoms by only 4%. And I can’t find where it says that they found no evidence that vaccination prevents viral transmission in healthy adults. I do see that the actual study says, “Inactivated parenteral vaccines were 30% effective against influenza-like illness if content matched WHO
    recommendations and circulating strain, but this decreased to 12% when these were unknown.” …but I don’t see it reduced to 4% effectiveness.
    I am in no way a fan of the flu shot or any vaccines. But as I sahre this with others in hopes of opening their minds, I want to make sure the conclusions I share (in the form of a Gaia article) are accurate lest you and I lose credibility. Gaia Health: can you help clear this up?

    • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

      I appreciate your vigilance. You are correct – I picked up the wrong item. The correct figure should be 12%. That will be corrected.

      It should, though, be noted that the study states that the vaccines have NO effect on complications – and that’s the primary reason for giving them. That makes clear that there is no actual benefit from the flu vaccine.

      The authors include in their conclusion: “The results of this review seem to discourage the utilisation of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”

      Combine a 12% rate of effectiveness with untrustworthy studies, and even those untrustworthy studies finding no effect on complications (which are what kill), there can be no justification for the flu vaccine.

      Again, thank you for your vigilance.

    • crystalblueeyes

      Notice that her reply was re-posted..but it’s “miswest” mom not Midwest mom. Her comment was deleted then hastily re-posted when they were called on it. Last time I’ll visit this pathetic site.

    • http://twitter.com/doctorsensation tonibark

      the studies are referring to efficacy, not effectiveness. efficacy is antibody response. in no way does antibody response mean effectiveness in the real world since flu is combated by innate immunity prior to acquired immunity kicking in.
      remember, vaccine manufacturers are allowed to make claims on effectiveness based on efficacy via “surrogate endpoints” as per the FDA. it is the only product the FDA gives such slack to. this is why there are no studies showing less flu in a group which received the vaccine to one which didn’t. In fact, this is the case for vaccines, in general. another reason the flu vacc is a waste of time is most reported flu is not actually influenza. in any given year only about 7.5 % of those reported to have flu have influenza, the rest have things like RSV or coxsackie. all fever with resp symptoms are reported as flu even though they are not. all deaths from respiratory failure with fever as well as many other things are reported as from flu, even though most are not influenza positive. the actual stats are up on CDC and state health pages. but reporting everything as flu sells flu vaccines.

  • Midwest Mom

    Oh no! I didn’t want to believe the posters below when they accused you of deleting any posters who seemed oppositional…but was my comment just deleted? I came back to check for a response and my comment is gone.

    • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

      No comments have been deleted. If any are missing, it’s an error on the part of Disqus.

      • Midwest Mom

        Ah-ha…there it is now. Strange. Thank you.

  • sickoftheslant

    I don’t know who is moderating the comments under GaiaHealth, (or who runs this blog) but wow- you really come off as defensive and combative and kind of nasty in your replies to people who question the slant of this article. I would never recommend this article based on your unprofessional manner- you detract from the ideas you are trying to promote by being so childish. I want the facts and some educated background explanations on this issue- but I don’t trust you now to be able to provide that, free of bias. I’ll be looking elsewhere to become educated and informed on this topic.

  • Pingback: ジョン ラポポールト・・・ワクチン帝国の崩壊 2012年10月9日 | 目覚め Despertando.me

  • Pingback: Public Health Officials Warn About 3 Nasty Flu Viruses This Season | MPHProgramsList.com

  • Pingback: NWO Big Pharma Vaccine Wing Has Now Collapsed! « Political Vel Craft

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Erwin-Alber/548856074 Erwin Alber

    Thanks for this! – more evidence to show that vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise dressed up as disease prevention by means of junk science. One would in my opinion have to be a complete idiot to get oneself or one-s children with a flu shot, or any other vaccine for that matter. To be fair, there is a mitigating circumstance: I was a complete idiot for many years as I believed in this lie that vaccines prevent diseases until I came across information which made me realise that vaccination is a massive fraud.

    • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

      Don’t confuse a specific case with unwarranted and foolish generalisation, Erwin. There is excellent evidence for the efficacy and safety of most vaccines. The flu shot has limited utility in healthy adults, but many other vaccines save lives and prevent other serious damage to people’s health and well-being.

      • http://www.facebook.com/ronald.b.blij Ronald B. Blij

        @facebook-1210381735:disqus,
        Dr Suzanne Humphries, a practicing nephrologist (kidney physician) says
        the vaccine industry isn’t giving people both sides of the story, and
        parents need to get informed before subjecting their children to
        vaccines that can potentially cause serious harm or even death
        http://youtu.be/efto1LpWkKw

        • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

          So what? It’s not news that information from pharmaceutical companies with vast financial interests in their products is going to be biased. There is excellent evidence from a variety of non-biased sources that the majority of currently recommended vaccines are both safe and effective. Finding fault with one of them is _not_ sensible grounds for suddenly declaring them all to be useless or dangerous.

          Also beware the lone voice that argues against the tide of scientific opinion, even if they are medically or scientifically qualified. They might be the maverick that’s first to spot something the rest of us have missed or overlooked, but statistically, they are far more likely to be (a) wrong and/or (b) biased by their own personal experiences and beliefs.

      • http://twitter.com/doctorsensation tonibark

        why don’t you supply us with the studies showing safety and effectiveness of them. SInce they don’t have to show effectiveness, only antibody response, I doubt you’ll find any of the studies you purport to exist.

  • Pingback: Grippeschutz-Impfung hat keine Schutzwirkung

  • Pingback: Das Impfstoff-Imperium ist zusammengebrochen « kulturstudio

  • Pingback: Das Impfstoff-Imperium ist zusammengebrochen | NaturProdukte Blog

  • Pingback: Rumms! Das Impfstoff-Imperium ist zusammengebrochen. Studie widerlegt Impfthese! | Erinnerungsforum

  • Pingback: The vaccine empire has collapsed | True Activist

  • Pingback: Jon Rappoport – The Vaccine Empire Has Collapsed – 14October2012 « The Golden Age Daily

  • Pingback: It’s time for your flu shot…..NOT | DrMeyer's Blog

  • Pingback: BOINNK!!! | Internationaal onderzoeksteam concludeert: GEEN ENKEL GRIEPVACCIN WERKT.

  • Pingback: The Vaccine Empire Has Collapsed | TheSleuthJournal

  • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

    Which is why most doctors advocate influenza vaccinations for the current predominant strain only in those at higher risk of complications from influenza. It’s also mildly amusing that rampant anti-vaccination proponents only seem interested in good quality scientific evidence when it supports, rather than refutes, their claims. Check the definition of “confirmation bias”.

    • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

      The only flu vaccine available each year is what doctors recommend – and the vaccine is pushed heavily by doctors every year on everyone, not just on those at higher risk of complications. That vaccine is, at this point, trivalent – NOT focused only on the “dominant strain”.

      • http://www.facebook.com/chris.cole.7967 Chris Cole

        I don’t “push” the influenza vaccine on anyone. I do tend to ask parents why they chose not to vaccinate their child with the other recommended vaccines on the standard immunisation schedule, if they haven’t done so.

  • Pingback: The flu shot can pound sand

  • Pingback: Das Impfstoff-Imperium ist zusammengebrochen « sladisworld

  • Pingback: Grippeimpfungen wirkungslos.

  • Pingback: KOAT 7, Police State Cheerleaders, Big Pharma Mouthpieces, Propaganda Ministers « Police State Cheerleader!

  • Pingback: Internationaal onderzoeksteam concludeert dat geen enkel griepvaccin werkt « Werkgroep "George Orwell"

  • Piotr

    Why don’t you read the abstract yourself:
    http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD001269/vaccines-to-prevent-influenza-in-healthy-adults

    I think the conclusions are slightly (though not entirely) different than the author here suggests.

  • Anonymous

    I’m recieving vaccination against flu every year since I was six. So far it was 18 times and I have NEVER had flu during those years.
    Also I have gone through every compulsory vaccination I had to and I NEVER had a problem and I don’t know any person that had.
    Even though I went through two year vaccination against acarid alergy (about 20 shots) and it went significantly better with my alergy. Now I can live withou any antihistaminics.
    Now you can see, that sometimes it is actually working. But don’t expect you’ll be healthy if you eat lot of junk food, doing no sports, taking light drugs, smoking, drinking lot of alcohol or being obese.
    Vaccination will not MAKE you healthy, will HELP you to be healthy.
    I love people who have respriratory problems and they were/are heavy smokers and they are complaining how nobody can help them (just for example)

    • lauriej1

      I’ve never had a flu shot and never got the flu — ditto for dozens of other people I know. On the other hand, the ones who were sucked in to getting a flu shot (once) got the flu and swore they’d never get another flu shot as long as they lived.
      The Cochrane study simply verifies what many of us have suspected for years.
      It’s also interesting to note that Canadian researchers noticed in the early weeks of the supposed H1N1 pandemic that people who got a “regular” flu shot for the 2008-2009 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn’t received a flu shot.

    • http://www.facebook.com/lmarkssmith Lisa Marks Smith

      I have never had the flu and only had the shot because my Dad was going to have surgery and I didnt want to get sick. Bad plan since I spent 24 days in the hospital due to the shot. I would have recovered from the flu in at most 2 weeks not the 4 years it took to recover from the shot.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Golfbrat Donna Newby Hayes

    My work is pushing hard for everyone to get the vaccine, if we don’t we have to wear masks at work. I’m 47 years old and have had the flu once when I was in the 7th grade. I’ve never had the flu vaccine… Guess I’ll be wearing a mask

  • cookielee

    I was vaccine injured 21 years ago. I was hospitalized with 105 temperature and was unable to move. I will never take another vaccine. Everyone should decide for themselves if they are willing to take a vaccine. Now I take beyond tangy tangerine liquid nutrition to build my immune system.

  • Pingback: BENESSERE GENERALE | Vaccini truffaldini: silenzio stampa dal 2010

  • Pingback: No value in flu vaccine « My blog

  • Pingback: Probiotika senken das »schlechte« Cholesterin und könnten eine Herzkrankheit verhindern | NaturProdukte Blog

  • Pingback: Flunk the Flu Shot, Dr. Rashid Buttar Advanced Medicine, Whooping Cough Vaccine Failure, Cancer Increase Relations, Steroid Injection Meningitis Outbreak, Chemtrails Detox, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Homeopathic Drainage, Anti-Coagulant Options, Dr. N

  • Pingback: Kein Grippe-Impfstoff bietet Erwachsenen Schutz vor der Grippe. Toll, aber wissen wir ja! | Wissen bedeutet Einflussnehmen…

  • David

    A rational discussion against influenza vaccinations is necessary, and I can appreciate that corruption is present in “Big Pharma,” but this is just an opinion piece filled with anti-pharmaceutical zealotry. Beginning with the title itself, her statements are extreme and absolute; and if you read the 2010 Cochrane review (which is not new) you’ll find she misrepresents much of what the authors stated. Sticking to a few of her main points:

    She says there is no evidence of benefit, no value in any influenza vaccine. Copied from the Authors’ conclusions, “Influenza vaccines have a modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost.” This is what we tell patients – if you do get the flu it probably just won’t be as bad or last as long.

    This one is my favorite because she writes it in bold letters; she says, “There goes the whole herd immunity argument” because no evidence was found that vaccination prevents viral transmission in healthy adults. She’s right, no evidence was found, but this has nothing to do with Herd Immunity. She misinterprets what the concept actually means. The idea behind HI is not that the vaccine will prevent person A, who’s infected with the virus, from transmitting it to person B; it suggests that person A is less likely to contract the virus at all, or will harbor the virus for less time, so there will be no virus for them to spread to person B. Copied from Cochrane, “None of the studies included in the review presented results evaluating the ability of this vaccination to interrupt the spread of the disease.” They are referring to Herd Immunity.

    She says they found no evidence that flu vaccines prevent complications. She’s right, no evidence was found, but we’re only talking about healthy adults ages 16 – 65. This is not the population we worry about having complications. It is the very young, the very old, and the very sick we worry about. 37 children have died so far this season alone from influenza-associated complications. We want to vaccinate healthy adults to help prevent the spread of viruses to vulnerable groups such as those children.

    An unbiased breakdown of a review should always discuss its possible limitations, which she did not do, but here are a few. If you look at the dates of the studies included in the review, many of them are over 30 years old; vaccine purity and standardizations have changed significantly just in the past decade. Also, allocation concealment was either inadequate or unclear in 30 of the included trials; this is huge in downgrading the quality of evidence due to possible bias.

    If this had been presented as a balanced article I can see where some of the points are relevant. We need to address the fact that many, not all as the author states, of the studies showing benefits of the vaccine are industry-funded. Also, it is true that these industry-funded studies are more likely to be found in prestigious journals, but regardless of what’s thought to be going on behind the scenes, this is because they also have greater resources to put out more complicated and comprehensive studies than public institutions.

    A final note – Propagating misinformation like this article is dangerous when others appear to take it as proven medical advice. The author’s only health-related credentials seem to consist of online coursework in homeopathy.

    • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

      The concept of herd immunity suggests that, if enough people are vaccinated, then everyone is protected. Since this study found little-to-no benefit from flu vaccines, it clearly found that the vaccination program did nothing to promote herd immunity.

      That’s right – they found no evidence that flu vaccines prevent complications. You seem to imply what? That it found otherwise?

      No claim to being unbiased was made. Regarding the age of some of the trials included, the fact is that they tried to find all trials. Naturally, some of them are old. Yet, you want to imply that it’s a negative trait of the trial?

      And then you make the author the issue, which is an ad hominem attack. It matters not what you say about the author. As soon as you do that, you’re trying to denounce the article by implying that the author is somehow inadequate. That is not a legitimate argument. The rest of them arerather poor and couched in supercilious tones.

  • David2

    My note on the author was not an attack. With all this discussion of
    industry vs. public studies, I don’t believe you can disagree with
    knowing your source. Furthermore, when a writer deviates from existing
    conclusions, and makes assumptions where conclusions could not be made, I
    think it necessary to consider their expertise in the subject as
    relevant. You can call out ad hominem if you wish but your words are
    swimming in fallacies.

    Your second, and now different,
    explanation to disprove Herd Immunity is a perfect example of a hasty
    generalization. Your logic if flawed, but you already know that. I’ve
    explained in detail why what you’re saying is
    incorrect; the relevant text is still quoted above. This review did NOT
    examine or attempt to make any conclusions regarding the influenza
    vaccine’s ability to interrupt the spread of the virus.

    Regarding
    complications, again, this study is not generalizable to those under 16
    years of age, those over 65 years of age, or those with compromised
    immunity. It has been well established that a healthy adult has very low
    risk of complications from influenza, I’ve agreed with that, and those
    in the groups I just listed are the ones who are susceptible to serious
    sequelae of the virus. I’m repeating my point that you fail to make this
    crucial distinction in the article, and again attempt to generalize
    results.

    As is conventionally done, I thought it useful to provide some scrutiny of
    the methods used rather than just accept blind statements from the
    results.
    Yes, I still believe the ages of the studies to be a strong limitation
    of the review. The authors themselves discuss how much vaccine purity
    and standardization has changed. You believe quantity is paramount to
    quality in evidence-based medicine? Regardless, my quarrel is not with
    the findings of the review, most of which I’m in concurrence, it’s with
    your crass manipulation of them.

    If
    my arguments came across as supercilious, it’s because I was following
    the tone of the article. I don’t believe that warrants my posting
    privileges being blocked, if that’s why it was done. Whether you think
    them poor or not, I believe my posts add to a discussion that deserves
    talking points from both sides.

  • Ron Heart

    I use to get the flu shot every year, but I would still get sick. So now I take my chances and just call and talk to a doctor. MD247 give me access to a doctor anytime day or night. With out crazy doctor bills or long ER visits, I can get relief fast.

  • Vincent “Vinny” Setala

    “At best, vaccines might be effective against only influenza A and B,
    which represent about 10% of all circulating viruses. Each year, the
    World Health Organization recommends which viral strains should be
    included in vaccinations for the forthcoming season. ” (Summary Chochrane review 2012) “Might be” effective for A and B, (totals approximately 10% leaving 90% still vulnerable? Lot of $ there for a 90 per cent ineffectiveness rate..imho. World Health Organization? The same folks whom originally wrote the Planetary Viability and Sustainability study? The same crew who decided it would be necessary to bring the global population to “less than a billion people?” Which was revised by the UN Agenda 21 summit conference (beginning at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil conference,) and now the maximum population is under a half million. Those folks determine a “best guess” scenario to prevent influenza mortality/contagion rates, along with morbidity/mortality rates from opportunistic respiratory disorders?

    Perhaps you would care to enlighten us on the immune system and neurological response to a 200-300% increase in “nano-particulate aerosol aluminum?” Why? Because even the EPA admits to these levels, which are deadly enough, however as the EPA as well as the FDA and have been bought and paid for how much is REALLY being used in the current cloud seeding weather modification experiments. If you need me to explain, I will, but I have to get to the hospital. Had the vaccines a few moths ago, and last night couldn’t breathe well along with 101.2 fever. First vaccine in 25 years, first respiratory infection since then as well.

    Will check back in later unless hospitalized.

  • Pingback: Vaccination - A Controversial Medical Science Topic - Mastery of Life

  • Pingback: Bulletin du CQLPE #16 : La révolte gronde face à la menace posée les compteurs ‘intelligents’‏ | Lanaudière Refuse

  • Pingback: Rising Cases of New Bird Flu Highlight Vaccination Debate and Need for New Vaccines | Editor's Desk at Equities.com

Search Gaia Health

Subscribe to the Gaia Health
Newsletter

Don't miss breaking Gaia Health articles.
Rest assured that your e-mail address will never be sold or shared.

newsletter software